(No changes to text.)
By Jenna Greene
March 28 (Reuters) - Breakups are rarely easy, but the
acrimony over a busted blockbuster deal can rival
finger-pointing by the bitterest of star-crossed lovers.
Consider the blame game unfolding now between Kroger ( KR ) and
Albertsons ( ACI ) in Delaware Chancery Court, where each grocery chain
is attempting to fault the other for the failure of their $25
billion merger, which was blocked by judges in both federal and
state courts in December.
To hear Albertsons ( ACI ) tell it in its Chancery Court lawsuit seeking
billions of dollars, Kroger ( KR ) had "a classic case of buyer's
remorse" after negative reaction to the merger by investors,
workers and politicians, as well as falling post-pandemic
profits. As a result, Kroger ( KR ) allegedly failed to take "any and
all actions" possible to win antitrust approval for the deal, as
required by the merger agreement.
In a countersuit made public on Tuesday, Kroger ( KR ) says Albertsons ( ACI )
"secretly coordinated" with C&S Wholesale Grocers, which was set
to buy hundreds of grocery stores that the parties planned to
divest, in a "surreptitious scheme" to pursue their own
regulatory strategy.
Kroger ( KR ) is seeking unspecified damages from Albertsons ( ACI ) for
willfully breaching the merger agreement.
Also jumping in the fray, C&S on March 14 sued Kroger ( KR ) in
Delaware Superior Court seeking payment of a $125 million
termination fee it says it's entitled to under its agreement
with Kroger ( KR ).
This isn't the first time companies in a merger gone wrong
have sued each other in Delaware, though the cases tend to be
highly fact-specific. To misquote Tolstoy, every failed merger
fails in its own way.
Still, a 2020 decision by Vice Chancellor Travis Laster holding
that Cigna ( CI ) breached its obligation to try to close a $54 billion
merger with Anthem - but that the merger would probably have
been enjoined anyway, so Anthem wasn't entitled to recover
damages - will likely come into play in allocating the burden of
proof for the thwarted grocery union.
A Kroger ( KR ) spokesperson declined comment.
Albertsons ( ACI ) in a statement said it was "steadfastly committed
to the success of the combination," but that Kroger ( KR ) "did not
hold up its end of the bargain."
A C&S spokesperson said via email that the New
Hampshire-based company "worked tirelessly in support of the
merger and divestiture, including communicating with both Kroger ( KR )
and Albertsons ( ACI ) executives."
Announced in 2022, the proposed merger would have been the
largest-ever supermarket combination.
Kroger ( KR ) - operating stores under regional names including
Fry's, Harris Teeter and King Soopers - and Albertsons ( ACI ) - whose
regional banners include Jewel-Osco, Safeway and Vons - together
have about 5,000 supermarkets across 48 states.
Going into the deal, Kroger ( KR ) anticipated it would have to
sell off stores in locations where the two chains competed
head-to-head to appease the Federal Trade Commission and state
regulators. Per the merger agreement, Kroger ( KR ) agreed to divest up
to 650 properties and lined up C&S as the buyer.
Like many antitrust fights, market definition was key.
Kroger ( KR ) argued its grocery competitors nowadays go beyond
traditional supermarkets to include retail behemoths like
Walmart ( WMT ), Costco and Amazon. If Kroger ( KR ) could convince regulators
to adopt such a broad view of the competitive landscape, perhaps
divesting a few hundred stores might assuage their concerns that
the merger would lead to higher prices for consumers.
At its first meeting with the FTC, Kroger ( KR ) proposed shedding
just 238 stores, Albertsons ( ACI ) said. Kroger ( KR ) subsequently offered to
divest 413 stores to C&S, later upping the total to 541, then
579 outlets.
Albertsons ( ACI ) argues this was the wrong approach, calling
Kroger's ( KR ) position "indefensible." According to Albertsons ( ACI ),
Kroger ( KR ) "squandered its credibility with regulators" by refusing
to propose a viable divestment package, its lawyers from
Williams & Connolly; Selendy Gay; Dechert; and Richards, Layton
& Finger wrote in the Delaware complaint.
Albertsons ( ACI ) also says Kroger ( KR ) shut it out of the "disorganized
protracted" process of selecting C&S as the purchaser, and
that picking a wholesaler with a limited track record of running
retail outlets "introduced new obstacles" for regulatory
approval.
The FTC along with attorneys general from eight states and
the District of Columbia sued to block the deal in 2024, while
Colorado and Washington filed suits on their own.
Albertsons ( ACI ) says it's owed a $600 million contractual
break-up fee since the merger failed to close by the outside
date set in the agreement, plus additional damages.
Under the terms of the merger agreement, Kroger ( KR ) was in
charge of antitrust regulatory strategy, while Albertsons ( ACI ) was
obliged to cooperate and support the effort. Kroger ( KR ) faults
Albertsons ( ACI ) for allegedly engaging in "secret communications"
with C&S, urging it to tell regulators it needed more stores
from Kroger ( KR ) to compete effectively post-merger, Kroger ( KR ) counsel
from Weil Gotshal & Manges and Ross Aronstam & Moritz wrote.
Offering to divest more assets is of course one way to
mitigate antitrust concerns, but here, Kroger ( KR ) said Albertsons' ( ACI )
rogue strategy backfired, making regulators believe C&S was "a
weak buyer that would not be an effective competitor regardless
of the number of stores it received."
Kroger ( KR ) also alleges Albertsons ( ACI ) manufactured a "faux
litigation record" of "lawyer-crafted letters" so it would be
ready to sue its would-be partner for billions of dollars if the
merger failed to close. To bolster the allegations, Kroger ( KR ) notes
that shortly after court decisions enjoining the merger were
issued, Albertsons ( ACI ) moved to terminate the deal and sued Kroger ( KR )
in Delaware for damages.
"No doubt capable counsel represents Albertsons ( ACI ), but even
they could not draft a 140-page complaint in a few hours,"
Kroger ( KR ) said.
Was having a complaint ready to go nefarious? Or just
advance planning?
The Delaware court will decide this and other questions in
weighing whether the union was ever meant to be, with a possible
trial late next year or early 2027.
(Reporting by Jenna Greene)
(c) Reuters 2025. All rights reserved. Republication or redistribution of Reuters content, including by caching, framing or similar means, is expressly prohibited without the prior written consent of Reuters. Reuters and the Reuters sphere logo are registered trademarks and trademarks of the Reuters group of companies around the world.