As much as investors would like a playbook for rate cuts, there just isn’t one. Historically, the year following a first rate cut has sometimes been rocky for markets, but about half the time, it has resulted in double-digit returns.
The difference between the positive years and the rocky ones isn’t a function of what the Fed does, but rather why it’s doing it.
When the Fed cuts its benchmark interest rate, it’s usually for one of two reasons:
- Because economic growth is faltering, and lower rates may help support it. This is what happened during the financial crisis in 2008 and the pandemic in 2020.
- Because higher rates have done their job of bringing down inflation, so the Fed can recalibrate its policy.
When the Fed cuts rates because it can—to recalibrate policy—rather than because it has to—to support the economy—this has been historically bullish for stocks. Fortunately for investors, I believe that’s exactly the scenario we may be in currently—despite recent market pullbacks fueled by fears of slowing growth.
While the labor market has shown signs of softening, unemployment is still low. Despite lower-than-expected jobs growth in August, unemployment fell to 4.2%. Meanwhile, inflation fell to 2.9% in July, down from a recent high of 9.1% in 2022.
Here are a few more indicators that are bullish for equities.
1. Earnings growth
Historically, falling interest rates have provided a slight boost to the market, but it’s earnings growth that really matters. When earnings are positive and growing, that’s bullish for stocks. Although data can always change, that’s where we are now.
2. The level of interest rates vs. inflation
Strong earnings growth isn’t the only differentiator this cycle; the level of rates compared with inflation is another. The higher the starting point of short-term interest rates versus inflation, the bigger the market return has been the following year.
This metric offers a way of capturing the potential firepower of Fed policy—in other words, if the Fed needed to cut rates further, would it be able to? The current starting point—with a fed funds target rate of 5.25%–5.50% but inflation lower than 3%—has historically been a positive mix for the stock market.
3. Leading economic indicators and bank lending standards
Is earnings growth going to continue? There are a couple of statistical tailwinds that might not be good, but may be “good enough.”
Two critical factors—leading economic indicators (LEIs) and bank willingness to lend—fit the bill. Both of these indicators give clues about what's coming down the pipeline for the economy. While neither is currently strong, both are improving. Right now, they also help make this impending rate cut cycle look different, and that difference has mattered historically to equity markets when the Fed is cutting rates.
Bottom line: The Fed’s first rate cut isn’t what should drive the market going forward. But if you put rate cuts into context with other economic indicators that have mattered historically, I believe it starts to look like a positive environment for stock returns over the next year.
Denise Chisholm is director of quantitative market strategy in the Quantitative Research and Investments (QRI) division at Fidelity Investments. Fidelity Investments is a leading provider of investment management, retirement planning, portfolio guidance, brokerage, benefits outsourcing, and other financial products and services to institutions, financial intermediaries, and individuals.
In this role, Ms. Chisholm is focused on historical analysis, its application in diversified portfolio strategies, and ways to combine investment building blocks, such as factors, sectors, and themes. In addition to her research responsibilities, Ms. Chisholm is a popular contributor at various Fidelity client forums, is a LinkedIn 2020 Top Voice, and frequently appears in the media.
Prior to assuming her current position, Ms. Chisholm was a sector strategist focused on sector strategy research, its application in diversified portfolio strategies, and ways to combine sector-based investment vehicles. Ms. Chisholm also held multiple roles within Fidelity, including research analyst on the mega cap research team, research analyst on the international team, and sector specialist.
Previously, Ms. Chisholm performed dual roles as an equity research analyst and director of Independent Research at Ameriprise Financial. In this capacity, she focused on the integration of differentiated research platforms and methodologies. Before joining Fidelity in 1999, Ms. Chisholm served as a cost-of-living consultant for ARINC and as a Department of Defense statistical consultant at MCR Federal. She has been in the financial industry since 1999.
Ms. Chisholm earned her bachelor of arts degree in economics from Boston University.