While still representing a relatively small portion of the roughly $9 trillion ETF universe, actively managed ETFs are exploding in popularity. Consider this: Active ETFs now represent nearly 9% of ETF assets under management, up from roughly 2% in 2019, according to data from Morningstar.
Let's explore actively managed ETFs and whether they are right for you.
ETF universe expanding
Many investors and financial advisors like ETFs because they can offer tax advantages compared to some other alternatives, can be traded intraday, and offer transparency into underlying holdings, among other potential benefits. Perhaps most importantly, investors and advisors have gravitated to ETFs due to their generally lower relative cost.
The degree of transparency is the key differentiator between active stock ETFs and the majority of ETFs in the market today. There are more active ETFs (1,473, as of June 2024) than ever before, with more launching on a continuing basis as well as many mutual funds converting to actively managed ETFs.
Investors might pick actively managed investments (like many mutual funds and ETFs) based on the belief that rigorous research, sophisticated portfolio construction, and expert trading may add value for shareholders. Actively managed ETFs are a portfolio of subjectively chosen investments by a fund manager, rather than those chosen via a rules-based index that defines a passively managed ETF.
Essentially, active ETFs combine the potential benefits of an ETF structure with those of active management. The idea is to perform better than a benchmark index through flexible active management.
In the past, many fund managers were reticent to offer actively managed ETFs due to potential costs associated with full transparency in the form of daily holdings disclosure (which had historically been required of ETFs).
That's changed to a large extent. After the SEC changed a rule in 2019, allowing some firms to offer actively managed ETFs that are not required to disclose daily holdings, many of these same firms have embraced active ETFs. (Note that you may see these funds referred to as semi-transparent ETFs.) Investors can maintain transparency with access to most recent public holdings and, in some cases, into the fund’s current exposures and drivers of risk and return through daily proxy portfolios.1
The rule change has steadily made actively managed equity ETFs more widely available in the marketplace. Data from Morningstar shows that active ETFs have added nearly $400 billion of inflows over the past 5 years, as of April 2024, suggesting the trend may be in the early innings.
Of course most, if not all, of the risks associated with ETFs also exist for actively managed ETFs (see disclosures for important information on additional risks associated with active ETFs). However, this innovative ETF structure has the potential to allow investors to capture more of the outperformance that active managers seek to provide by mitigating some front-running and trading risks.
The value of research
As part of a fund's management fee, investors pay active managers to conduct company research to identify stocks that might outperform and those that might underperform. Such research decisions have the power to add to shareholder returns.
However, those returns may take time to materialize in trading activity across a suite of funds, as individual managers make investment decisions based on their specific portfolio construction and risk mandates. If these research insights are revealed to the market before the desired investment position can be established, that can erode the potential value.
Flexibility to trade over time may enhance performance
To determine how quickly to build or reduce a position, traders use their expertise to balance the cost of liquidity with the risk of not executing a trade all at once (should market volatility lead to significant price changes). Because mutual funds and ETFs often trade in large volumes, asset managers frequently spread trades out over multiple days to reduce costs.
Disclosing trading activity to the market while positions are still being built or reduced could allow for increased front-running and preclude cost-saving trading strategies, thus leading to lower net performance. Opportunistic or algorithmic trading strategies could reduce trading costs even further for actively managed ETFs that are not required to disclose holdings daily. ETFs that do not need to disclose holdings daily may benefit from the ability to implement trading strategies that preserve more of the potential active management value for shareholders.
Investment implications
The shift to enable some firms to offer ETFs without the requirement to disclose holdings daily may help reduce the potential costs to shareholders associated with full transparency. At the same time, active ETF structures are designed to provide transparency into the funds’ holdings and drivers of performance. And market demand from investors who are seeking the benefits of ETFs and who believe in the potential of active management has clearly shown an appetite for such investments.